Where does this leave female athletes? Unfortunately, it leaves them in a position where market forces, rather than federal ...

Most schools that intend to opt into revenue sharing are proceeding as though the lion's share of the funds will be slated ...

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has rescinded the name, image, and likeness (NIL) guidance under Title IX of ...

By removing Title IX protections from NIL rules, the president is sending a clear message to colleges: Men deserve all of the ...

Fans disagree on how Tennessee should share revenue with athletes. And they have a lot of questions. So let's answer them in ...

President Trump’s new administration just clarified that Title IX equity principles should not apply to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) payments, ...

The Trump administration’s latest directive on Title IX offered athletic departments more certainty about paying players, ...

A Utah House committee approved legislation allowing universities to directly pay athletes. The latest version of the bill ...

Thanks to new updates between Title IX and NIL, the ability for all student-athletes to fully capitalize on the collegiate monetization process is uncertain.

Women’s athletic opportunities are important, the administration claims — but not necessarily as important as the opportunities afforded to men.

Earlier this week, the United States government, under the auspices of the new Trump administration, issued a significant new decision regarding NIL.