The Supreme Court said Friday it will review the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s no-cost coverage mandates for certain preventive care services, putting the landmark health care law in front of the justices again just as President-elect Donald Trump – who tried to repeal the law during his first presidency – returns to the White House.

A new case before the Supreme Court targeting preventive coverage mandates under Obamacare gives President-elect Donald Trump a chance to undermine one of the most controversial aspects of the healthcare program that he promised to “repeal and replace” nearly a decade ago.

The Supreme Court will hear a case determining the fate of free preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. In a brief order issued Friday, the justices said they will consider

A new Supreme Court case attacking the Affordable Care Act may not put the core provisions of the law in danger — but if the litigants get their way, it would give President-elect Donald Trump a new mechanism to cripple HIV care in the United States,

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit that will determine whether preventive services will remain fully covered by group health plans under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). | The Supreme Court will decide the fate of the preventive services provision,

The Supreme Court is seen as the court discusses TikTok ... can’t be forced to provide full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. The lower-court ruling chipped away at the program sometimes referred ...

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether some preventive care coverage requirements under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) should be

The Supreme Court said Friday it will review the constitutionality ... to cost-free preventive treatments and services, including HIV prevention medications, heart statins and various screenings ...

The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider reinstating ... full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. The lower-court ruling chipped away ...

The counsel emphasised that Sections 31 and 40 placed a clear responsibility on the state for medical treatment, including ensuring access to appropriate hospital care as per the medical regime provided in the Act.

The Supreme Court said Friday it would review a case involving a group of Maryland parents who sued their children’s school district over its refusal to allow them to opt out of elementary school